Notes on using Biblioscape

Paul asked me to contribute some notes on this forum about my experience in using Biblioscape. I hope they're of some help.

There’s no question that Biblioscape can be a bit daunting to a new user, because it has such a broad range of capabilities. It’s a lot more than just a straightforward manager of references. But in my experience you can find it useful very quickly so long as you just focus on the basics – storing stuff, organizing stuff, and citing stuff. Because these notes are supposed to be about how I use it, I’ve also added some thoughts on another feature of Biblioscape that I find invaluable, getting at stuff remotely. I’m uncomfortably aware that there are vast areas of the program that I’ve left untapped thus far, and I keep stumbling across more of them. But here I’ll stick to what I know best (or least worst).

Life before Biblioscape

I’ve been using bibliographic software since roughly the dawn of time, or at least that’s what it feels like. My first foray into this genre involved writing an application myself, at some stage in the ‘80s when I decided that I needed it for a thesis. This exercise gave me a healthy respect for anyone attempting such a venture, and when, a few years later, I discovered what real bibliographic software was capable of, I decided that writing it was best left to the professionals.

My first commercial bibliographic software was Papyrus, a cleverly-written application with the wittiest manual I’ve ever encountered (it has a hate figure called The Bibliography Editor, which each journal has, and whose sole aim in life is to ensure that his or her journal requires its authors to format references differently from any other journal on the planet). Unfortunately, Papyrus never made it from MS-DOS to Windows and is no longer being developed, which meant that I had to find something else.

That’s when I discovered Biblioscape. There were a number of competing products at the time, all of which had their adherents and their strengths and weaknesses. What particularly drew me to Biblioscape was its range of capabilities by comparison with the other products I investigated, but most particularly, its capacity to be accessed remotely over the Internet. That really mattered to me because I work at a university – that is, they pay me for turning up reasonably regularly – which is a multi-campus operation, meaning that I regularly work from three different locations including my study at home, and not so regularly from other locations around the globe. The idea of having a single database located on a computer at one of the offices, but accessible from anywhere in the world, was very attractive. And it became even more attractive when I thought about the exigencies of working on a paper with colleagues.

In retrospect I’m somewhat surprised to find myself admitting that both criteria were good ones. I have found the flexibility of Biblioscape to be a very good thing even though I’m sure I’ve used only a fraction of what it offers, and the Internet accessibility of the system has been incredibly useful. So how do I use it?

General impressions

Biblioscape can do an awful lot, which means that it has a very complex interface which can take some getting used to. You also need to learn the basics about things like how to enter authors’ names so that Biblioscape understands them correctly. Figuring out which field is for what can be a little demanding, too, because there are so many of them. You may well find yourself changing the way you use some of the fields as you get more experienced. Some things, such as formatting authors’ names and temporary citations, need learning straight away; others, such as the various ways of storing notes, are probably best left until you’ve used Biblioscape for a bit and you’ve got used to how they all work.

Biblioscape does have this habit of popping up obscure error messages from time to time, although it’s doing it a lot less than it once did. Mostly they require you to shut it down and restart it, and usually this has to be done using Task Manager, but the good news is that they’ve never, in my experience, damaged the database. Every so often it’s a good idea to rebuild the database because errors do creep into the indexes from time to time, but the database itself seems extremely robust. Once a reference is in there, it stays in there.

Storing stuff

Primarily, I use Biblioscape as a place to put stuff that I might want to look at later. One of the hazards of academic life is that you constantly encounter papers, books, chapters, manuscripts, websites, articles, snippets of information, quotations, theses, and so on, and you never know what to do with them. You have this sneaking suspicion that they’re going to be useful at some stage in the future, but right now you can’t think how, so they need filing in a form that gives you a fighting chance that you might be able to locate them when you do need them.

Just now, for example, I was seized by the thought that I’d encountered a quotation somewhere in the past few years in which an author had said something about people thinking that the time in which they live is unique. I did a search of my Biblioscape database on the word “era” (which produced a manageable 41 hits, much to my surprise), and there it was in the “Memo” field of a 1999 paper: “It is a human tendency to believe that one lives in an exceptional era, fundamentally different from earlier periods”. That’s a quote that I think everyone who writes about societal matters should have framed above their desks.

I could find this because I put any notes I take about papers in the “Memo” field (previously, the “Notes” field) of the reference. I don’t worry too much about whether I’m going to find it useful in future; I just put in notes, extracts from the article (hopefully, not forgetting the page references), and commentaries in a disorganized fashion, and rely on Biblioscape’s various search facilities to find the material later.

I tend to use the much more extensive Notes module for commentaries on more than one paper, but this could well change now that notes are much more integrated into the References module through the “Taking Notes” tab in the reference editor. I’m still trying to figure out a routine for taking advantage of this new arrangement and its very interesting enhancement, the Composition module (which can be used to assemble notes into draft papers).

I also make liberal use of the links facility, for example to show which references cite which. This is very handy when you’re having trouble tracking down a particular reference; sometimes the search leads you to a related one which is linked to the one you want.

There’s a corollary of Murphy’s Law which states that any extract that you copy into your database will almost, but not quite, include everything you actually need when you come to write a paper, so I also try to store a way of getting to the full article. For journal papers this is getting increasingly easy as archives like JSTOR include stable URLs (URLs which will always point to the article in question), so I just put the stable URL, if it’s available, into the “URL” field. For articles without stable URLs, I usually download the pdf file (or scan the article if, for example, it’s a book chapter or a paper from a very old journal issue) and store it in a directory on the same computer that stores my Biblioscape database (see below under “getting at stuff remotely”). I don’t use Biblioscape’s attachment facility for storing papers because (again, as explained below) my database is located on one of my computers which I can reach from anywhere in the world, and attachments have to be on the local machine to work. So I have an FTP server on the machine that stores the references and files, so that all I need do is put the URL of the paper in the URL field of the reference. The term editor is very useful here for inserting the routine bits of the URL – the bits that specify the userid, the password, and the domains (e.g. ftp://userid:password@myftp.myuniversty.edu/).

Then when I need the paper, all I have to do is click on the URL and it’s downloaded and displayed on the screen. In Biblioscape 8 it’s even easier: click on the “URL” tab at the bottom of the main window or halfway down the Reference Editor, and the document appears in Biblioscape’s window. Very cool.

Organizing stuff

Biblioscape has many different ways of organizing references. Folders are probably what I use least, because a reference can only be in one folder, and the kind of work I do means that references really don’t split neatly into non-overlapping sets. They do have their uses, though, for example for importing references. Importing is a bit of a hit-or-miss affair in which you can never really tell whether it’s going to work properly until after you’ve done it. There are just so many different ways in which references can be tagged for import that creating accurate filters for them is extremely difficult. Sometimes, as for example in the case of the vast but ineptly tagged CSA Illumina database, it’s virtually impossible, and the only thing you can do is import the references as best you can and then fix them. If you import the reference into the body of the database it can sometimes be hard to track it down if something really weird happened and you don’t know which data is in which field so you don’t know what to search for in order to find it. So I have a folders called “Imported”, and I always import references to this so that I can check them for oddities (mainly data in the wrong fields) and correct the mistakes before moving the new references to a working folder.

Categories are really helpful. I use them extensively to organize references for particular writing projects. They can even be used to help analyze the material in the references. For example, I’ve just been writing something about the definition of “career” (a surprisingly slippery concept with almost as many meanings as the writers who work with it). I built up a list of references that one might expect to have definitions in them, and categorized them as “Career definition”. That made it very easy to work through the list of all the references in that category, and assign each reference to two new sub-categories, one called “Definition” and the other “No definition” as appropriate. Then I could go through the references in the “Definition” sub-category and examine the different treatments that “career” has been given in the literature. If I’d thought more about it I could have examined each definition in turn and created sub-sub-categories for each different treatment of the topic, which would have made it even easier to write the review. Alternatively, if I’d been using Biblioscape 8, I could have created a note on career definitions. Then I could have looked at each reference in turn, and if its Memo field had had material which was relevant to the topic I could have linked the “career definitions” note to the reference and copied over the relevant bits. As I said above, Biblioscape is a lot more than just a place to store stuff.

Citing stuff

This is where bibliographic software is a life-saver, and it’s probably the main reason that most people buy it. Biblioscape’s approach involves inserting so-called temporary citations in the text where you want the citations, and then formatting the paper when needed, and it works pretty well. I got a glimpse of how complicated the process is when I wrote a macro that formats WordPerfect documents for Biblioscape; by the time I’d finished I had 2000 lines of code and a serious headache. The problem is that posed by our old friend, the Bibliography Editor: the rules that journals impose for how references must be formatted are usually complex, often (e.g. APA) stupidly so, and occasionally (e.g. the legal profession’s Blue Book) moronically so. You’d think these highly-educated people could think of something better to do with their time, but it doesn’t seem to be the case.

The outlets I write for require the author—date formatting system, and I really like the way Biblioscape handles this. It takes a little getting used to – frankly, it’s a bit geeky – but once you’ve got the hang of it you can do a lot with it very easily. I find Biblioscape’s ability to leave out the author, the year, or the parentheses when required extremely useful, for example when I have to say something convoluted like:

…as noted by Goffman (1959; see also Bourdieu, 1989; Van Maanen, 1982, p. 98)

which, for the record, is done as follows:

…as noted by Goffman ([^np ^na Goffman, 1959 #16257]; see also [^np Bourdieu, 1989 #16267 / Van Maanen, 1982 (, p. 98) #16252])

If you’re not familiar with how to format temporary citations this will look a mess; but the rules are very straightforward and quickly mastered. In case you’re very new to Biblioscape and you’re baffled as to why anyone in their right mind would want to go to the trouble of concocting code like that instead of just typing the citation exactly as they wanted it to appear, it’s so that when you format the paper, Biblioscape can construct the bibliography for you. If you’ve ever had to do that chore by hand you’ll know that this feature of bibliographic software alone is worth the price of admission.

Getting at stuff remotely

I find this capability of Biblioscape extremely useful; I use both Internet features: BiblioRemote and BiblioWeb.

BiblioRemote is a server that sits on the machine that you decide is going to provide the home for your database; that is, it’s a small application that runs on the machine and allows Biblioscape users elsewhere to use the database as if it were on their own machine. Using Biblioscape over BiblioRemote is a bit slower than if the database were on your local machine, and if you have a bad Internet connection it can be painfully slow, but under these circumstances BiblioWeb provides a good alternative. My copy of BiblioRemote runs on a PC that sits under my desk at my main office at the university. Fortunately, our university network people aren’t obsessed with the need to control everything, so I don’t have any trouble accessing the database from computers anywhere in the world. If you do have paranoid network people you may have a problem here unless you can persuade them to open the appropriate ports for you. BiblioRemote takes a little while to get the hang of, but once it’s up and running you can forget about it; it just runs without needing any attention. It’s great for collaborative work, although more often than not my collaborators haven’t been Biblioscape users, which is where BiblioWeb comes in handy.

BiblioWeb provides a pretty useful set of features for editing and searching your database from a web browser. Like BiblioRemote, it runs on the computer that you’ve designated as the home of your database. It’s much more tolerant of slow Internet connections than BiblioRemote. When I’m working on a project with a colleague who isn’t a Biblioscape user, I just create an ID for them on BiblioWeb, and they can get at the same references that I can, add temporary citations to the paper we’re working on, and even format the paper when necessary. It’s also a great way of setting up a reading list for a doctoral class, too; the students can access the papers easily, and they can learn something about bibliographic software in the process (it never fails to amaze me how many have no idea that such software exists).

That’s not all, folks

To reiterate my opening comment about what Biblioscape is capable of, I know that I’ve just scratched the surface of its feature set. There’s also the new Composition module, the Librarian module (a very useful way of keeping track of books that you lend to colleagues and students, or running a small library if your group has one), and a myriad other bits and pieces. Some are somewhat on the obscure side (for example the Charts module, which doesn’t seem to have been developed lately), and others you may well have other ways of doing (for example the Tasks module). I take the view that one of these days I might suddenly discover that one of these undiscovered features may dig me out of a hole, but that in the meantime there’s more than enough in the program to keep me happy.

Hugh Gunz
University of Toronto
June, 2009

Notes on using Biblioscape

Having noticed the interest in uses of Biblioscape and some considerable time ago being asked to provide a summary of my use here goes: -

I came upon Biblioscape a number of years ago now, at the early version 5 level. Because of time pressures and the steep learning curve I did not immediately take to it, but recognising the capabilities and never a one to bunker down too long on an issue I placed it on one side until I made time available.

That time arrived when I began planning my research project on privacy, and the programme has stood me in good stead since then. The various data searching capabilities were a strength identified to me early on which remain today.

Hugh Gunz stated his pleasure at the humour contained within Papyrus, looking into the sample database within Biblioscape reveals a high level of humour, the functionality of the user interface can also be playful and is certainly worth climbing the learning curve. Like many others there are many areas I do not yet use, and others where I push the envelope.

My background provided some knowledge of SQL and programming logic, which assisted understanding once I commenced using Biblioscape regularly, maintaining a pro and library edition, is somewhat over the top for my needs but has been useful. As with some others the upgrade cost presents concerns but any good cost benefit analysis can resolve that and Biblioscape remains my main database tool of choice.

Briefly describing processes of research will assist in understanding my demands on Biblioscape as well as serve to refresh the data collections some, so here goes:

The project has consistently maintained a philosophical and soft sciences perspective, which I believe to be important. Linguistics at the formative and semantic level has been growing in importance and detail throughout the project as a prerequisite to attempting to understand privacy comments.  The political and jurisprudential disciplines have been a constant and ongoing intrusion and distraction, whilst they are important in the formation of the fabric of the social privacy construct, as much as some would like they do not form the whole. It would therefore be lunatic of me to focus solely in those areas. Based in the United Kingdom, intrusive surveillance is very visible and has taken on a strong Big Mother aspect, so independence of thought becomes more highly important, something visibly not prized by all and positively denigrated by some.

Originally, I mainly used the notes module, although my attempts to provide links from within notes to other portions of other notes were naive and frustrated at that time. In response to an enquiry, Paul and CGI upgraded to include hyperlinks, which answered the immediate need but soon identified the difficulty of managing the complexity of those links within my research material. The Biblioscape team are always very responsive to user needs, which then presents a demand on the user to keep up to date with the application.

The complexity resulted in a reconsideration of my approach and requirements concluding in a clearer definition of which data correctly resided within references and which in notes. For example, my 'Definitions' entries reside in both references and notes, the references entries being those where an external quotable definition exists; These are cross referenced to 'Word' references which act as pivot cross references to other definitions for that word in a one to many relationship. The Notes module 'Definitions' entries contain expressions of my developing thoughts (or with the other notes a cryptic mess so far) depending on the perspective they are viewed from at the time. The brainstorming creation process is a welcome enhancement to notes. Considering Hugh Gunz's description of some of his work from a purely logical perspective, it struck me that the two reference types (Word and Definition) are perhaps more common than expected and in use across many disciplines would it be worthwhile including them as standard references?

Biblioscape contains an impressive collection of import facilities simplifying the capture of data from the web. As I make extensive use of the web, these are important. During the period spent learning how to effectively use those I compiled an Import Filters tutorial for new users. An outcome of that was a raised awareness of the strengths of Regular Expressions, which prompted further reading and skill enhancements for myself on that subject, which proves to be most useful within Biblioscape and many other applications.

One of my Biblioscape uses which maybe of interest and which I perceive would have value to a number of disciplines, but has not yet been described, has been to break down some information from two distinct disciplines which use very structured written language data into Biblioscape for analysis, providing some focus and experience to progress the ongoing softer work. With the Biblioscape Import Filters this meant cleaning, further formatting and readying each text prior to import from whichever source was chosen as most suitable. (i.e. Access, Spreadsheet or Text/Biblioscape Tag File.). That work was repetitious and time consuming so, initially working with scripts or macros and Biblioscape Tag Files, (learning the hard way they did not provide sufficient time savings,) I progressed to object oriented programming and Visual Studio .Net and Regular Expressions to develop my solution. Purchasing the Biblioscape ODBC driver (excellent value) and then the ElevateSoft DBISAM ADO driver, I have developed and continue to slowly refine a small application which provides a number of simple functions for my data collection, one of which is parsing text files into user defined segments and importing them as discrete references to provide some of the raw material I was initially trying to produce using hyperlinks.

Those rather arbitrary references types are:-

Part
Section
Clause
Sentence
Phrase
Particle
Fragment
Bit
Remnant

Each is initially automatically cross-referenced with the master document and each relevant level above it and specifically keyworded with identified keywords or phrases where they exist within the documents themselves, something simple to deal with programmatically. For some specific areas, I had thought it would be useful to provide automated cross-referencing to existing references actually mentioned within the document texts, but have not progressed that, although I intend to with the keywords.

To search and automatically cross reference on user selected phrases/words within Biblioscape appears to me to probably be of use to many, but in my opinion user validation/acknowledgement should form an important part of that process, otherwise much data could sit there unrecognised in its detailed levels.  

The limitations in the number of reference type icons has been and continues to be a frustration.

Being a touch typist of several decades practice the automated process has still speeded my data compilation considerably and removes much of the drudgery of data compilation for me, allowing my reading to focus on validating content, cross-referencing and some still early analysis to validate the methodology. Being rather a layperson in most disciplines this is time consuming with many learning curves.

Identifying and considering changes within documents has become an important element in following the growth of knowledge/feelings in particular areas and detail, so I see the possible enhancement to Biblioscape in comparing documents would be a real boon for some parts of that.

As to plug-ins it seems logically possible for Biblioscape to be able to utilise something similar to my basic document parsing engine from within a reference, where full text is contained within the ref_doc field, although my basic and simple application contains more than is necessary, the unwritten specifications for the parsing process would be adaptable in that context, and yes, could be considerably improved by professional programming.  Certainly, a simple breakdown by document structure is not difficult and a visual presentation of the parsing points to the user prior to final actions facilitates accuracy, and identifies any typo problems not caught programmatically, for manual correction. A programmatic breakdown by grammar is beyond my needs and knowledge level (You only have to read this to perceive that!) and anyway I felt that during my brief foray through Semantics and Semiotics that similar tools are likely to already exist.

Overall my basic processes are similar to many who have already explained their working patterns, I do not at the moment use BiblioWeb.

Much of my web data collection has tended to be conducted mainly via an off-line browser with an Access back-end which is open and accessible to the user, and a separate web monitoring application. Where I need several articles they are retained then imported into Biblioscape off-line. As well as allowing the use of the Biblioscape import filters off-line, this process facilitates and assists the breakdown of multiple documents by specific site or document format specific parsers. (The document text conversion process is a rather unsatisfactory one via Word interop, but is sufficient for my limited needs).

For small quotable portions of web articles I also utilise a small Firefox plugin called QuoteText which is amenable to quickly producing a simple restricted Biblioscape tag file. All of these methods provide me with a set of flexible collection processes which meet my needs at the moment.

I suppose these practices are partially down to the sensitivity to privacy engendered by the research, or maybe merely reflect the internet aspects of the privacy definition specified in the privacy policy at http://www.ipc.on.ca/english/Privacy/http://www.ipc.on.ca/english/Privac...

*    Privacy is about having the ability to control or influence the way in which information about you is collected, used and disclosed. Information privacy may also be described as “informational self-determination.”

Which recognises the potential impact of social pressures on liberty and also reflects some territoriality aspects.

I sometimes find it difficult to make some data enquiries so I do occasionally use the database level tool provided with Biblioscape — Dbsys.exe — which has been of great assistance in developing and running SQL commands which take advantage of linkages between data within tables that are not facilitated in Biblioscape itself.  As I increasingly use the Categories module that need reduces, but it is good that Biblioscape allows for unforeseen requirements.  A word of caution for the new user, those situations should be relatively scarce if your data collection/base is sufficiently carefully planned, so always look and focus within Biblioscape first as the search capabilities there are extremely capable and enable SQL queries in a user friend and transparent manner without the need to learn any SQL. Any use of Dbsys in this fashion identifies to me a difficulty with my research data structure which requires further research and resolution.

I am beginning to reach the stage of thinking about the graphical presentation of data which I had originally vaguely thought may be achieved utilising the charts module or vector drawing software like Serif Drawplus, my thoughts now veer towards using Visual Studio system.drawing to programmatically achieve that presentation, as I perceive it to be simpler and more flexible when tied to the language data and the paradoxical needs I have.  I see the Biblioscape database remaining an important part of that process collecting and containing the main research data prior to some result portions being exported to facilitate the graphical presentation.

I have looked with interest at the Compositions module of Biblioscape and from a project management perspective recognise the abilities inherent in the way Compositions are intended to be used. I know I am wrong in not pursuing using compositions now in the modular way intended, but my rationalisations in managing my time and focus at the moment currently have that on hold. I am sure once compositions becomes familiar to me and I adapt my practices to take advantage of that, I will wonder why I never started with it earlier.

Moving on to Categories, to me here are linkages between some reference fields and categories. For example, the reference Country field is also a Category requirement and I see from comments in the support group it is for others. Utilising something like the UN country lists to generate one set of political country divisions within Categories duplicates the effort expended in completing the Term editor, so it would be helpful if it were possible to select a category or category tree to partially populate the term editor. This makes sense from a user input perspective. It is logical that some categories within any given research project will also appear as some reference field values required during citation. With the Term Editor appearing to be a work in progress this observation may be superfluous.

Whilst I have used the tasks module, and confusingly continue to sometimes do so, it has not become my main research project management tool. Trying to pin down why, I think mainly that has to do with the task creation process. I am unable to create a task directly from within a reference, note, chart or category so have to move back to the main application and then tasks before returning to the previous location. It is simply easier to ALT-TAB to another application and come back. Perhaps a keyboard shortcut or drop down menu entry which allowed for task creation with an optional link creation from within the other module windows would help there. Apart from set periods of time specifically for planning and reviewing the project management, and only creating tasks then from notes previously made, I see no other way of effectively working with it.  If any other users have a working method utilizing tasks effectively whilst engaged within the research in other modules I would be interested. The categories GTD appears to be an attempt to produce something similar which fulfils that need, but I suspect tasks and GTD need to come together as GTD is likely to have similar issues associated with it.

Despite the occasional drowning in research data from specific discipline areas, as well as the more directed commercial demands and distractions and my rambling style, independent progress does continue with Biblioscape being of great assistance in managing the data and analysing it at the levels and in the methods I am currently undertaking.

Ian W

N.B.  1 For those interested, the ODBC driver presents some challenges when used to access Biblioscape from within the Visual Studio (pro 2002) environment which I found to be due to conflicts with some field names. These can be overcome by aliases but do present an initial puzzle. It does work very well, but that issue may give the appearance of a problem with the driver; It is not, it is a problem somewhere across the interfaces.
2. Would you guess I am a Bibilioscape fan!

Thanks for the writeup. Very

Thanks for the writeup. Very interesting. Pretty similar usage here. Used to rely on BiblioRemote too for a couple of years but not for a while. Synchronizing works well enough for me and provides a free backup. I am also using attachments all the time - much faster to open them via Biblioscape. I prefer to save local PDFs of all papers I can get hold of. This allows me to search through their full text at will. There are pretty powerful tools out there for that. dtSearch is a great one.

I wish the support for images would be better. Than I would be using notes much more. It would be great to have all my notes in one place. Currently, I am using three separate programs for note-taking. OneNote being one, purely because it allows unlimited canvas with free arrangement of images and is robust with images too. Even for text, rough notes are often much easier to recognize when they retain visual context. I just take screen grabs of web pages rather than save text mostly.

I am also intrigued about the Charts but am not using them. They could be great but competing with specialist programs in this areas will be probably too much.

Am yet to begin using compositions properly. Have not progressed past experimentation but will certainly explore them more in the future.

If I may harp on about the

If I may harp on about the visual ways of working, can we borrow some ideas here?

http://www.officelabs.com/projects/canvasforonenote/Pages/default.aspx

Quite suggestive but could be much better still. For example, how about allowing non-exclusive alternative spatial/visual arrangements in a similar way we can have linked folders (now collections)?

I am finding that even with search, etc. I am not returning to much of what I note or otherwise save. Visual access and the ability to flexibly use images would greatly improve re-usability and creative use of information...

Thank you for posting the

Thank you for posting the link. We want to add a thumbs view for the future release. Especially for the notes module. But it is not going to be that sleek. Thanks, Paul

Well, the ability to pan,

Well, the ability to pan, zoom and reposition thumbnails in non-exclusive views would already be really great. The editing abilities are less important - a double-click to open an item would be enough.

Yes, I'm wondering about

Yes, I'm wondering about syncing the database across computers rather than BiblioRemote. The main thing that holds me back is the benefit to colleagues from being able to use BiblioWeb to get at the database. There's no question that BiblioRemote gets very hard to use when the Internet connection is bad, but I suspect that it's too deeply connected with Biblioscape for this issue to be easily tackled. It would be interesting to get Paul's thoughts on this (i.e. whether there's any prospect of making Biblioscape less dependent on a fast connection to BiblioRemote).
You make a very good point about the need for good backup, though: I've always been a bit paranoid about this, with daily backups to an offsite server. So far it hasn't let me down, but syncing across several machines is a good way of getting to the same point.

Hugh, I also like the idea

Hugh, I also like the idea of syncing a database over the Internet. But it is hard to do. So it is still a long term goal.

I share the same thoughts.

I share the same thoughts. It's got a stip learning curve, or I should say learning mountain, but once you get the hang of it, it becomes unreplaceable. The best is yet to come. That's the thought that crosses my mind when working with this software and examining its evolution. After a bit more than I year I managed to have a hard copy library of articles, books and reports that constitutes 14 banker boxes, all in manila folders identified by the first author and the year, alphabetically sorted. Now, because I have Biblioscape I can find just about any single item in this library, regardless of the search criteria I use!!! This is pretty awesome if yout think. And that does not compare with the digital library of hundreds of PDF files that can be as easily retrieved.

I barely touched composition, but I am sure I am a heavy user of the References, Notes and Categories modules. The PDF viewer and the Online search, in my opinion were the best improvements in B8. Thanks for the hard work.

PDF Viewer is a great idea. . . like Western civilization

The PDF viewer would be a great improvement over not having one, but it doesn't seem to have arrived yet. I bought BS 8 with the idea that it actually has this feature, as advertised. I have owned the program since early June and I have yet to have been able to view a PDF file on it. There is vague mention of a patch buried in the bottom layers of these forums, but where is this patch and does it work? Is this the same patch as is mentioned under Patch Release on the download page? The description of that patch does not mention the problem of errors when trying to read PDF files on the local disk (that it only works with the free version of Reader, or the error "File name does not start with '&PDF-'. (why should it contain those characters???)). One can only conclude that v8 does NOT have the ability to view PDF files despite the bold advertising statement. At the moment, then, the PDF viewer for BS8 seems to be just BS.

If you reference has the

If you reference has the path of a PDF file added in the "Attachment" field, the "PDF" tab in your reference preview pane will becomes "PDF*". If you click this tab, the PDF file will be displayed inside Biblioscape.

And if it doesn't?

Your advice sounds like a Sony troubleshooting guide. You have quoted to me the designer's plan, but it doesn't happen. I get the asterisk, but nothing shows up in BS. Before I installed Acrobat Reader (7.x), the free version, it would open Acrobat Pro. But after installing free Reader, it gives me an error message (see above). After installing the patch, I get new error messages. Your message implies, and I am inclined to agree: this *should* be simple. What is going wrong?

Acrobat Pro will cause the

Acrobat Pro will cause the Acrobat Reader control stop working. If you have Acrobat Pro, the PDF file cannot be displayed inside Biblisocape. You can click on the Attachment icon on the preview header. The PDF file will be opened outside of Biblioscape.

I have Acrobat Reader 9 and

I have Acrobat Reader 9 and B8, and this feature works like a charm. I cannot thank the developers enough for such a great job. I named all my PDF files by first author last name, then year, and than title. It is the best digital library I ever had. Whenever I have to attach something, I can easily find it in the Attachments folder, regardless of being already input on B8 before or not. If I had Acrobat Pro, thought, I think this issue could be worked around by setting Acrobat Reader as the default program for opening pdf files, but I can't be sure. Good luck.

For the next major release,

For the next major release, we plan to make Biblioscape extract meta data from PDF file. So if the PDF file has authors, year, title, etc. stored as metadata, users don't have to enter those info manually. By just adding the PDF file, Biblioscape will create a new reference and have those metadata automatically added.