These days, I used "RIS -- Reference Manager (Ver. 5 compatible)" to import records from IEEE. But it seemed some fields could not be imported correctly. So I'd like to make a new filter specially for IEEE based on the RIS filter. However, I don't know the meaning of some fields and can not catch the instructions in the online help. Could anybody help me work out the new filter? A record from IEEE is as follows. What is "SN"? I always have problem with it. And I think "TY = CONF" means a conference paper, but it is always imported as Journal Article. :(
Thanks a lot!
TY - JOUR
JO - Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on
TI - Classified perceptual coding with adaptive quantization
IS - 4
SN - 1051-8215
SP - 375
EP - 388
AU - Soon Hie Tan
AU - Pang, K.K.
AU - Ngan, K.N.
PY - 1996
KW - adaptive signal processing
KW - discrete cosine transforms
KW - image classification
KW - image coding
KW - image sequences
KW - image texture
KW - quantisation (signal)
KW - transform coding
KW - H.261 coded sequences
KW - RMS based H.261 coder
KW - Recommendation 500-5
KW - adaptive quantization
KW - adaptive scene classification
KW - bit rate reduction
KW - classified perceptual coding
KW - discrete cosine transform coefficients
KW - edge class
KW - fine-texture class
KW - flat class
KW - image block
KW - image sequences
KW - mean opinion score
KW - perceived image quality
KW - perceptual coder
KW - reference model 8 intramode decision
KW - sticking noise artifacts removal
KW - subjective viewing tests
KW - texture class
KW - texture masking energy measurement
KW - visual thresholding
VL - 6
JA - Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on
AB - A new technique of adaptively classifying the scene content of an image block has been developed in the proposed perceptual coder....
ER -
I uploaded an import filter
I uploaded an import filter for RIS at http://support.biblioscape.com/node/72 recently. RIS format changes between reference manager major releases. Third party call their format RIS but it could be a mix of tags used in different RIS releases. To help you create better import filters, we need at least one example for each reference type. Thanks.
I tried your ris_ei.bif for
I tried your ris_ei.bif for EI search. It worked fine with Journal papers. Unfortunately, it had some problems with Conference papers. It seemed a "BT" field was missing in the filter. Please try the two examples below. By the way, regarding to the filter for IEEE. What kind of examples do you need? The one in my last post was not enough? I'm glad to make more for you.
Thanks a lot!
TY - CONF
N1 - Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
TI - Extending the prediction error coder of H.264/AVC by a vector quantizer
BT - Visual Communications and Image Processing 2005, Jul 12-15 2005
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
A1 - Narroschke, Matthias
AD - Institut fur Theoretische Nachrichtentechnik und Informationsverarbeitung, Universitat Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany
VL - 5960
IS - 4
PY - 2005
U1 - 06089710738
SP - 2267
EP - 2278
SN - 0277-786X
CY - Beijing, China
PB - International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham WA, WA 98227-0010, United States
N2 - The standardized video coding algorithms are based on hybrid coding using blockwise motion compensated prediction and transform coding of the resulting prediction error. For the purpose of transform coding, the recent standard H.264/AVC applies an integer transform. For each block, the Lagrangian costs are analyzed, which are measured by the sum of the squared reconstruction errors and the bit rate weighted by a Lagrange multiplier. It is observed that the costs of blocks with marginally or diagonally correlated samples are frequently higher than the costs theoretically required due to the fact that the transform coder of H.264/AVC is unadjusted for these blocks. In this paper, it is investigated if the coding efficiency can be improved by extending the prediction error coder by a vector quantizer which is optimized for the coding of these blocks. For each block of the prediction error either standardized transform coding or vector quantization is applied whereas the algorithm with lower costs is chosen. For broadcast quality at 34 dB PSNR, the bit rate is reduced by 7-10% compared to H.264/AVC using CAVLC with slightly reduced computational expense in the decoder. Compared to H.264/AVC using CABAC, almost the same coding efficiency is achieved with significantly lower computational expense in the decoder.
KW - Image coding
KW - Vector quantization
KW - Error analysis
KW - Lagrange multipliers
KW - Image reconstruction
KW - Bit error rate
U2 - H.264/AVC
U2 - MPEG
U2 - ITU
L2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.633517
ER -
TY - CONF
N1 - Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
TI - Bayes-risk minimized intra/Inter coding mode prediction for H.264
BT - Proceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging - Image and Video Communications and Processing 2005, Jan 18-20 2005
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
A1 - Kim, Changsung
A1 - Kuo, C.-C. Jay
AD - Integrated Media Systems Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564, United States
VL - 5685
IS - PART 2
PY - 2005
U1 - 05299222260
SP - 1053
EP - 1064
SN - 0277-786X
CY - San Jose, CA, United States
PB - International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA 98227-0010, United States
N2 - A feature-based coding mode prediction method is proposed to reduce the encoder complexity of the H.264 video coding standard in this work. The current H.264 reference codes employ exhaustive search to find the best mode that optimizes the rate-distortion performance among all possible intra/inter predictive modes. To develop a fast binary intra/inter-mode prediction scheme, we consider the expected risk of choosing the wrong mode in a multi-dimensional feature space. The proposed algorithm consists of three steps. First, three features are extracted from the current macroblock. Second, the expected risk is calculated for the corresponding partition in the trained feature vector space, which is used to decide where the feature vector lies in one of the three regions depending on the expected risk, i.e. risk-free, risk-tolerable, and risk-intolerable regions. Finally, depending on the region to which the feature vector belongs, we can apply mechanisms of different complexities for final mode decision. For the likelihood estimation of the risk, parametric and non-parametric density estimation schemes are compared in terms of the rate-distortion-complexity tradeoff. It is demonstrated by experimental results that the proposed algorithm can save approximately 20-32% of the total encoding time of H.264 (JM7.3a) with little degradation in the rate-distortion performance. © 2005 SPIE and IS and T.
KW - Image coding
KW - Algorithms
KW - Computational complexity
KW - Vectors
KW - Lagrange multipliers
KW - Binary codes
KW - Parameter estimation
U2 - H.264/AVC
U2 - Coding mode prediction
U2 - Bayes-risk minimization
U2 - Density estimation
U2 - Mode decision
U2 - Encoder complexity
L2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.589887
ER -
Are the two examples from Ei
Are the two examples from Ei site or IEEE site? Thanks.
Below are three examples
Below are three examples from IEEE.
Thanks.
TY - JOUR
JO - Communications, IEEE Transactions on [legacy, pre - 1988]
TI - Distributions of the Two-Dimensional DCT Coefficients for Images
IS - 6
SN - 0096-2244
SP - 835
EP - 839
AU - Reininger, R.
AU - Gibson, J.
PY - 1983
KW - Cosine transforms
KW - Image coding
VL - 31
JA - Communications, IEEE Transactions on [legacy, pre - 1988]
AB - For a two-dimensional discrete cosine transform (DCT) image coding system, there have been different assumptions concerning the distributions of the transform coefficients. This paper presents results of distribution tests that indicate that for many images the statistics of the coefficients are best approximated by a Gaussian distribution for the DC coefficient and a Laplacian distribution for the other coefficients. Furthermore, from a simulation of the DCT coding System it is shown that the assumption that the coefficients are Laplacian yields a higher actual output signal-to-noise ratio and a much better agreement between theory and simulation than the Gaussian assumption.
ER -
TY - JOUR
JO - Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
TI - Statistical distributions of DCT coefficients and their application
to an interframe compression algorithm for 3-D medical images
IS - 3
SN - 0278-0062
SP - 478
EP - 485
AU - Lee, H.
AU - Kim, Y.
AU - Rowberg, A.H.
AU - Riskin, E.A.
PY - 1993
KW - biomedical NMR
KW - computerised tomography
KW - data compression
KW - medical image processing
KW - 3 mm
KW - 5 mm
KW - X-ray computed tomography
KW - best fitting distribution functions
KW - bit allocation
KW - compression ratio
KW - displacement-compensated difference image
KW - distribution model
KW - head images
KW - interframe compression algorithm
KW - magnetic resonance images
KW - quantizer design
KW - slice thickness
KW - statistical distribution
VL - 12
JA - Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
AB - Displacement estimated interframe (DEI) coding, a coding scheme
for 3-D medical image data sets such as X-ray computed tomography (CT)
or magnetic resonance (MR) images, is presented. To take advantage of
the correlation between contiguous slices, a displacement-compensated
difference image based on the previous image is encoded. The best
fitting distribution functions for the discrete cosine transform (DCT)
coefficients obtained from displacement compensated difference images
are determined and used in allocating bits and optimizing quantizers for
the coefficients. The DEI scheme is compared with 2-D block discrete
cosine transform (DCT) as well as a full-frame DCT using the bit
allocation technique of S. Lo and H.K. Huang (1985). For X-ray CT head
images, the present bit allocation and quantizer design, using an
appropriate distribution model, resulted in a 13-dB improvement in the
SNR compared to the full-frame DCT using the bit allocation technique.
For an image set with 5-mm slice thickness, the DEI method gave about 5%
improvement in the compression ratio on average and less blockiness at
the same distortion. The performance gain increases to about 10% when
the slice thickness decreases to 3 mm
ER -
TY - CONF
JO - Signal Processing, 2004. Proceedings. ICSP '04. 2004 7th International Conference on
TI - Statistical model of quantized DCT coefficients
IS -
SN -
SP - 2572
EP - 2575 vol.3
AU - Fuhao Zou
AU - Zhengding Lu
AU - Hefei Ling
PY - 2004
KW - Laplace transforms
KW - data compression
KW - discrete cosine transforms
KW - maximum likelihood estimation
KW - probability
KW - quantisation (signal)
KW - video coding
KW - digital watermarking
KW - discrete cosine transform
KW - generalized Laplacian distribution
KW - image
KW - maximum likelihood criterion
KW - probability density function
KW - quantized DCT coefficient
KW - video
VL - 3
JA - Signal Processing, 2004. Proceedings. ICSP '04. 2004 7th International Conference on
AB - In this paper we propose a two-parameter probability model of quantized DCT coefficients for image and video (i.e. JPEG&MPEG format materials), which is based on empirical observation of their statistics in the quantized DCT coefficient domain. The parameters are evaluated in terms of the maximum likelihood criterion which is applied to different frequency coefficients space. The experimental results show that quantized DCT coefficients' distribution modeled by generalized Laplacian performs better than by Laplacian.
ER -
The above two examples were
By the way, the two examples in the first post were from EI.
Thanks a lot!
I just uploaded an updated
I just uploaded an updated RIS import filter that should work better than earlier ones. Please give it a try at http://support.biblioscape.com/node/138
It works fine now. Thanks a
It works fine now. Thanks a lot! ^_^