The style you used must specifies that if two consecutive citations have the same author and year, combine them. But in your case, both of them have suffix text, so combine tham doesn't make sense. In such rare case, you have to manually edit this. Or you can use two separate temp citations ([...^np #.] [...^np #.])
I see. Thanks for the explanation. Well, manual checking kind of undermines the automation. It is error-prone, etc. Using two citations as you suggest is not suitable either. As temp citations are inserted into the text it is often impossible to know that another book, etc., by the same author published in the same year might be used. So - the second option will also result in manual checking. I guess the solution is to avoid such a setting in the style, I wish I knew.
Might it be possible to consider automating this too in some way...?
When you insert two temp citations together with the same author and same year, you will know. Because it will look like [Smith, K. 2000 (...) #. / Smith, K. 2000 (...) #.]. You can then change it to the form as I suggested. I guess it is possible to not combine authors in such a case in the program. But since this case is so rare, we will not do this now. If more users encounter this problem. We will work on it. Thanks.
The style you used must
The style you used must specifies that if two consecutive citations have the same author and year, combine them. But in your case, both of them have suffix text, so combine tham doesn't make sense. In such rare case, you have to manually edit this. Or you can use two separate temp citations ([...^np #.] [...^np #.])
I see. Thanks for the
I see. Thanks for the explanation. Well, manual checking kind of undermines the automation. It is error-prone, etc. Using two citations as you suggest is not suitable either. As temp citations are inserted into the text it is often impossible to know that another book, etc., by the same author published in the same year might be used. So - the second option will also result in manual checking. I guess the solution is to avoid such a setting in the style, I wish I knew.
Might it be possible to consider automating this too in some way...?
When you insert two temp
When you insert two temp citations together with the same author and same year, you will know. Because it will look like [Smith, K. 2000 (...) #. / Smith, K. 2000 (...) #.]. You can then change it to the form as I suggested. I guess it is possible to not combine authors in such a case in the program. But since this case is so rare, we will not do this now. If more users encounter this problem. We will work on it. Thanks.
Well, if you know to look
Well, if you know to look for it....